Legal Opinion
City of Burlington v. Associated Electric & Gas Insurance Services, Ltd.
Supreme Court of Vermont
Decided September 22, 1995No. 94-098PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDooley, J.
This is a companion case to City of Burlington v. National Union Fire Insurance Co., 163 Vt. 124, 655 A.2d 719 (1994) (hereinafter NUFI), in which we decided that the primary liability policy the City of Burlington had with National Union Fire Insurance Co. did not require the insurer to defend or indemnify the City in the case of Moffatt v. City of Burlington. Having settled the Moffatt litigation, the City seeks a summary judgment that Associated Electric & Gas Insurance Services, Ltd. (AEGIS), an excess liability carrier, must indemnify it for part of the settlement amount. Finding…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Morton International, Inc. v. General Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
- Broadwell Realty Services, Inc. v. Fidelity & Cas. Co. of NYNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987
- City of Burlington v. National Union Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1994
- Cpc International, Inc. v. Northbrook Excess & Surplus Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- Hatco Corp. v. W.R. Grace & Co.—Conn.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1992
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Northern Security Insurance v. PerronSupreme Court of Vermont · 2001
- Applied Bolting Technology Products, Inc. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
- Select Design, Ltd. v. Union Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1996
- City of Burlington v. Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection & InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 2002
- Ulm v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2000
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.