Legal Opinion

Hall v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided December 6, 1921No. 5709PublishedCited by 23 opinions

In Error to the District Court of the United States for the District of New Mexico; Colin Neblett, Judge. Harry S. Hall was convicted of an offense, and he brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

CARRAND, Circuit Judge.

[1-3] Plaintiff in error, hereafter defendant, was convicted and sentenced upon each of three counts of an indictment charging violations of section 1, Act Feb. 13, 1913, 37 Stat. 670 (Comp. St. § 8603). The counts of the indictment were in the same language except as to the consignee and the property alleged to have been taken. The first and second counts named the Hall Hotel, Magdalena, N. M., as consignee. The third count named Harry S. Hall, Magdalena, N. M., as consignee. The first and second counts described the property taken as one barrel containing whisky. The…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Burton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  2. Rosen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. United States v. GoodingSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
  4. Ledbetter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  5. Dunbar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Goldstein v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
  2. Robilio v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1923
  3. Lewis v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1930
  4. Salerno v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
  5. Simpson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1923

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API