Legal Opinion

Jamesbury Corp. v. Litton Industrial Products, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided March 12, 1985No. Appeal 84-1079PublishedCited by 75 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NIES, Circuit Judge.

I

Jamesbury Corp., the plaintiff below, charged Litton Industrial Products with infringing claims 7 and 8 of its U.S. Patent No. 2,945,666 to Freeman entitled “Ball Valve”. 1 Following a seven day jury trial, the jury returned a verdict for Litton, concluding, in answer to an interrogatory, that the asserted claims did not differ in any “significant particulars” from the prior art. 2 Under the court’s instructions, this finding meant that the claims were invalid under 35 U.S.C. § 102(a) 3 for lack of novelty. Jamesbury had timely objected to the jury charge on the issue of…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. American Hoist & Derrick Company, Cross-Appellee v. Sowa & Sons, Inc., Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  2. Ssih Equipment S.A. v. United States International Trade Commission and Stewart-Warner CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  3. Jerry F. Connell, Gary F. Burns and Conelco, Inc., Appellants/cross-Appellees v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., a Corporation, Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  4. Hughes Aircraft Company v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
  5. Envirotech Corporation v. Al George, Incorporated and Monosep, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by75 opinions

  1. Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  2. The Read Corporation and F.T. Read & Sons, Inc. v. Portec, Inc., D/B/A Portec/kolberg DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
  3. Texas Digital Systems, Inc. v. Telegenix, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
  4. Exxon Chemical Patents, Inc., Exxon Corporation and Exxon Research and Engineering Co. v. Lubrizol CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  5. Nobelpharma AB v. Implant Innovations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API