Legal Opinion

Youngbluth v. Youngbluth

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided May 28, 2010No. 2008-527PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtReiber, C.J.

¶ 1. Husband appeals from the Washington Family Court’s enforcement order increasing the percentage of his military retirement benefits going to wife under the property division order that was finalized when the parties divorced. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

¶2. Husband is a career military man who spent more than twenty years in the United States Marine Corps. On July 1, 2005, husband, who was in his forties at the time, took a forced retirement from the military, and he is now collecting retirement benefits. In the initial divorce proceeding, which began before husband’s retirement…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. McCarty v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Mansell v. MansellSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. Michigan Canners & Freezers Assn., Inc. v. Agricultural Marketing and Bargaining Bd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Rose v. RoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Howell v. HowellSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
  2. Wallace v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
  3. Sandra L. Penland (Warren) v. John W. Warren, Jr.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2018
  4. Ayer v. Hemingway, Hemingway Construction and HarrisSupreme Court of Vermont · 2013
  5. Breslin v. SynnottSupreme Court of Vermont · 2012

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API