State v. Scotia
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOWARD, Judge.
In this appeal appellant contends that A.R.S. § 13-3405(C)(3) which makes it un*160lawful to knowingly “transport, import into this state, sell, transfer or offer to transport, import into this state, sell or transfer marijuana” (emphasis added) is unconstitutionally vague and overbroad. We do not agree and we affirm.
Appellant was charged by indictment with transportation of marijuana, a class 2 felony, and misconduct involving weapons. The weapons charge was subsequently dismissed by the prosecution.
The record shows that on April 15, 1984, at 5:30 p.m., Officer Davis of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. MurphyArizona Supreme Court · 1977
- Kizer v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1918
- State v. LycettCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
- State v. CarruthCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
- State v. CookCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Parada v. ParadaArizona Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. BraunCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
- State v. RowanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
- Parada v. ParadaArizona Supreme Court · 2000