Legal Opinion
Parada v. Parada
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided April 19, 2000No. CV-97-0520-PRPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ZLAKET, Chief Justice.
¶ 1 Raul Parada was married to Guiller-mina Suarez Parada during all of the time he worked for Santa Cruz County. That employment qualified him for benefits under the Arizona Public Safety Personnel Retirement System (hereinafter referred to as “the plan”), which is funded by contributions from employee members, their employers, and investment earnings. See A.R.S. § 38-843. Under the plan, a member’s monthly retirement benefit is calculated as a percentage of salary based on years of service. See id. § 38-845. The plan further provides for the monthly payment of a…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Van Loan v. Van LoanArizona Supreme Court · 1977
- Johnson v. JohnsonArizona Supreme Court · 1981
- Koelsch v. KoelschArizona Supreme Court · 1986
- Toth v. TothArizona Supreme Court · 1997
- Arizona Downs v. Superior Court of Ariz.Arizona Supreme Court · 1981
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Snyder v. Tucson Police Public Safety Personnel Retirement System BoardCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
- Facilitec, Inc. v. HibbsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
- Parada v. ParadaArizona Supreme Court · 2000
- Snyder v. TUCSON POLICE PUB. SAF. RET. SYS.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
- Snyder v. Tucson Police Public Safety Personnel Retirement System BoardArizona Supreme Court · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.