Sanford v. Van Arsdall
New York Supreme Court
Appeal from special term, Ontario county. Action by Amos 0. Sanford against Sarah J. Van Arsdall and others to foreclose a mortgage. Judgment for plaintiff. Sarah J. Van Arsdall appeals. '
1Opinion of the CourtMacomber, J.
The defendant, Sarah J. Van Arsdall, became a purchaser of the mortgaged premises October 23, 1872, and by the terms of the deed to her she agreed to pay the incumbrances then existing thereon, which consisted of a $1,000 mortgage, executed by one Kellogg and wife to Bronson, and a mortgage dated October 27, 1859, (the one involved in this action,) executed by one Dewey and wife to Birch to secure the payment of $2,000. The Birch mortgage was assigned to the plaintiff January 15, 1877. On the 13th day of March, 1873, the defendant and her husband executed a bond and mortgage to one Runyan in…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Smith v. . RobertsNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
- Claim of Wilbur v. Estate of WarrenNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
- Taylor v. ColemanTexas Supreme Court · 1858
- Huffstater v. HayesNew York Supreme Court · 1873
3Cited by5 opinions
- F. H. McGraw & Co. v. Milcor Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- Dominion Financial Corp. v. Haimil Realty Corp. (In re Haimil Realty Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- Austin Baldwin & Co. v. KohlerAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1916
- MTB Bank v. Federal Armored Express, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- F. H. McGraw & Co. v. Milcor Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945