Legal Opinion

Marmet Corporation v. Frank Briscoe Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided September 18, 1967No. 17276, 17277PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COMBS, Circuit Judge.

Defendants-appellees, Frank Briscoe Co. and Huber, Hunt & Nichols, 1 are the general contractors for the construction of a new Federal Office Building in Cleveland, Ohio.

Plaintiff-appellant, Marmet Corporation, is a subcontractor to fabricate and install the curtain wall of the building. Curtain wall consists of lightweight metal panels which are fitted to the skeletal frame of the building.

The subcontract was executed in March, 1964. By late October, 1965, Marmet was behind schedule in the performance of its contract and, on October 29, 1965, Briscoe notified Marmet in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. S. J. Groves & Sons Company v. Ohio Turnpike CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1963
  2. Williamson v. Wilbur-Rogers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1967
  3. Ward v. Flex-O-Tube Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1952
  4. Enterprise Roofing & Sheet Metal Co. v. Howard Investment Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1957

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States ex rel. Billows Electric Supply Co. v. E. J. T. Construction Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. US, ETC. v. EJT Constr. Co., Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API