Rush v. Nat. Bk. of Confluence (Et Al.)
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Schaffer,
The controversy here at issue is whether a fund raised by sheriff’s sale of personal property shall be distributed to the execution creditors or to the trustee in bankruptcy of the defendant. The court determined that it should go to the execution creditors and the trustee in bankruptcy has appealed.
There is no question of actual preference involved. The indebtedness of defendant, represented by the judg ments on which the executions were issued, arose several years before the fieri facias went out and the levies were made; this occurred on March 15, 1935. From…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Taubel-Scott-Kitzmiller Co. v. FoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Wilson v. City BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Liberty Nat. Bank of Roanoke v. BearSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Mencke v. RosenbergSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
- Keystone Brewing Co. v. SchermerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Stop 35, Inc. v. HainesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Stop 35, Inc. v. HainesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988