Legal Opinion

Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. Hemenway

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 20, 1907PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Dickinson District Court.— Hon. W. B. Quarton, Judge. Action to quiet title to real estate. There was a decree in favor of plaintiff, and defendants appeal.—

1Opinion of the CourtBishop, J.

This is the second appeal in this case. The opinion on the former appeal, reversing a decree of the court below, rendered in favor of plaintiff, will be found in 117 Iowa, 598. On reference to that opinion, it will be observed that the lands in controversy are part of a grant made by the general government to this State to aid in the construction of a. railway; the particular tract being within what *524is known as the “ indemnity limit.” It will also be observed that the sole matter at issue was whether such lands were taxable after being earned by the railway company, but before the issuance to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Adams County v. B. & M. R. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1880
  2. Adams County v. B. & M. R. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1876
  3. Sanxey v. Iowa City Glass Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1886
  4. Leach v. Germania Building Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
  5. Shorthill v. FergusonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1877

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Landis v. Interurban Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1915
  2. Kossuth County State Bank v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  3. Wapello State Savings Bank v. ColtonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  4. In re Estate of CookSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  5. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. NelsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1941

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API