Legal Opinion

In re Estate of Cook

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided September 28, 1909PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from, Harrison District Court. — Hon. N. W. Macy, Judge. Appeal from an order of the district court upon certain objections filed to the final report of the executrix, whereby it was held that the widow of the deceased was entitled to but one-third of a certain fund collected from a railway company, and that Arthur Cook and Mabel Cook were each entitled to one-third thereof. The executrix is appellant.

1Opinion of the CourtDeemer, J.

This case has once been before us, and the opinion filed therein will be found reported in 126 Iowa, 158. After the remand to the district court, the objectors, heirs of the deceased, Lucian S. Cook, amended the objections upon which the ease had been tried and submitted here, by pleading the statutes of Nebraska, which provide that damages for the death of a person shall be for the exclusive benefit of the widow and next of kin, and shall be distributed to such widow and next of kin in the proportion provided by law for the distribution of personal property left by intestates; that is to…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hanson v. ManleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1887
  2. Adams County v. B. & M. R. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1880
  3. Hempstead v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1884
  4. Allen v. City of DavenportSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901
  5. Zalesky v. Home InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Lawson v. FordyceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1945
  2. Buttman v. ChristySupreme Court of Iowa · 1924
  3. Landis v. Interurban Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1915
  4. Alaska Pacific Steamship Co. v. Sperry Flour Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. NelsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1941

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API