Marysville Investment Co. v. Munson
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Marshall District Court. Ejectment. Judgment for the defendants, at the October term, 1889. The plaintiff Company brings the case to this court. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Johnston, J.:
This is a proceeding to review the rulings and judgment of the district court of Marshall county, given *492in an action of ejectment, brought by the Marysville Investment Company against Harriet J. Munson, A. K. Munson, and J. D. Farwell, for the recovery of six lots in the town of Palmetto, now a part of the city of Marysville, in Marshall county, and also for damages in withholding the possession of the same. The greater part of the evidence offered by the plaintiff was excluded by the court, and these rulings are now assigned for error.
The…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Winfield Town Co. v. MarisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1873
- Sherry v. SampsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1873
- Krutz v. Paola Town Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1878
3Cited by6 opinions
- Clark v. American Cannel Coal Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1905
- Black, Sivalls & Bryson, Inc. v. ConnellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939
- Marysville Investment Co. v. HolleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1897
- Greiner v. FultonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1891
- Marysville Investment Co. v. HolleCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1897
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.