Legal Opinion

Stewart v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 21, 1943No. Appeal, 27PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Drew,

This is an action in assumpsit on a policy of insurance on the life of plaintiff’s husband. On appeal, the learned court below reversed a decision of the referee to whom the case was submitted by agreement of the parties, and ordered judgment to be entered for defendant. Plaintiff then took this appeal.

The pertinent facts appear in the findings contained in the referee’s report. Defendant on November 15,1937, issued a policy of life insurance in the amount of $2,792 to Thomas J. Stewart, his wife, plaintiff, being named beneficiary. The policy provided for the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mutual Life Insurnace v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  2. Rothschild v. N. Y. Life InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  3. Fishman v. Eureka-Maryland Assurance Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  4. Newman v. North River Ins. Co. of N.Y.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Karas v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1954
  2. Pennsylvania Real Estate Commission v. Harris, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County1957
  3. Beason v. Legal Security Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API