Legal Opinion
Butler v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided April 29, 1980No. 10330PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MACK, Associate Judge:
In this en banc proceeding reviewing criminal convictions, we have examined challenges to 1) the denial of a motion to suppress evidence and 2) the effective assistance of defense counsel who, prior to a hearing told the motions judge of his client’s intention to commit perjury, and who permitted his client to go to a bench trial before the same judge.1 Although the first issue presents a troublesome question in light of Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968), we need deal *845here only with the second; we have concluded that appellant, as a result…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- McKeiver v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Monroe v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Scott v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2008
- Emmanuel Charles Whiteside v. David Scurr, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
- Banks v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- Shockley v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1989
- Commonwealth v. MitchellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.