Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Mitchell

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 24, 2003PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGreaney, J.

A jury convicted the defendant of two indictments charging murder in the first degree by reason of deliberate premeditation and extreme atrocity or cmelty. The defendant’s motion for a new trial was denied by the trial judge, on the basis of affidavits, without an evidentiary hearing. The defendant is represented on appeal by the counsel who represented him in connection with his motion for a new trial. The defendant argues that he was denied constitutionally effective assistance of counsel (and incurred violations of other constitutional rights) when his trial counsel, relying on Mass. R.…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Commonwealth v. SaferianMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
  3. Nix v. WhitesideSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. United States ex rel. Wilcox v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
  5. Commonwealth v. WillieMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. Azad Haji AbdullahIdaho Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Commonwealth v. MurphyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
  3. State v. McDowellWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Commonwealth v. HollidayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
  5. State v. ChambersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API