Legal Opinion

Darling v. Department of Labor & Industries

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1940No. 28116PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.

Floyd Darling suffered an injury in the course of his employment on December 25, 1937. His claim was closed on March 9, 1938. On December 2, 1938, he claimed aggravation. He was, by order of the department, examined by two physicians. On December 27, 1938, the department made an order denying the reopening of the claim, based upon a finding that there had been no aggravation. On January 27, 1939, he appealed from that order, and the joint board, by order of January 8, 1940, sustained the order of the department. The claimant then appealed to the superior court of Snohomish county, and the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Alfredson v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1940

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Omeitt v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Sumerlin v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Hastings v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Calkins v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Karlson v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1946

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API