Legal Opinion

Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. R.L. Industries, Inc.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 6, 1985No. C-830948Published

1Per curiam

Plaintiff-appellant, Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company, filed suit against defendant, R.L. Industries, Inc., seeking payment of $2,360 that defendant had allegedly incurred by storing railway tank cars on plaintiffs track. Defendant moved for summary judgment, and the trial court granted the motion on the ground that defendant had paid the price for which it had bargained and had accordingly been billed. Plaintiff appeals, asserting as its single assignment that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment in defendant’s favor. The assignment of error has merit.

Defendant had originally…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MaxwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. FinkSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  3. Saalfield Publishing Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1948
  4. New York Central Railroad v. PeakOhio Court of Appeals · 1917
  5. Railway Express Agency, Inc. v. Youngstown Plant & Flower Co.Mahoning County Court of Common Pleas · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API