Legal Opinion

Saalfield Publishing Co. v. Public Utilities Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 1948No. 31063PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthias, J.

The question of law presented to this court is whether the order of the commission, that the lithographed paper sheets do not come within the classification of “paper, enameled, glazed or surface coated,” and, therefore, are not transportable at a lower rate than that imposed, is unreasonable or unlawful.

The record contains much evidence descriptive of these lithographed sheets. Briefly stated, these sheets of paper are 44 inches by 64 inches; the paper is of varying weights, some sheets being coated on one side and others coated on both sides.

■ The appellant purchases the paper from the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Great Northern Railway Co. v. Merchants Elevator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. United States v. Gulf Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Myers v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Bianchi v. Sears Roebuck & Co.New York Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Bianchi v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1956
  4. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. R.L. Industries, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Myers v. Pub. Util. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API