Legal Opinion

Stewart v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 11, 2015No. 5D15-2743PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Arsenio Stewart appeals the summary denial of his pro se motion for additional jail credit filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). The trial court correctly treated it as a Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.801 motion to correct jail credit, and denied it on the merits. However, because the motion was filed during the pendency of. Stewart’s direct appeal of his judgment and sentence (case number 5D14-2633), the trial court lacked jurisdiction to rule on the motion. See Padilla-Padial v. State, 152 So.3d 51, 52 (Fla. 5th DCA 2014); see also Mann-Stack v. Homeside…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sheppard v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2009
  2. Mann-Stack v. Homeside Lending, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
  3. Carlisle v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
  4. Romine v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
  5. Padilla-Padial v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Higgins v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API