Legal Opinion

Carlisle v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 15, 2000No. 5D00-3070PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

773 So.2d 647 (2000)

Robert E.H. CARLISLE, Appellant,

v.

STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 5D00-3070.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

December 15, 2000.

Robert E.H. Carlisle, Clermont, pro se.

No appearance for Appellee.

PALMER, J.

Robert E.H. Carlisle ("Carlisle") has filed a pro se Petition for Writ of Mandamus. The petition requests this court to issue a writ compelling the circuit court to rule on Carlisle's pro se motion for reconsideration of the court's denial of a portion of his motion for post-conviction relief. We strike the petition as being improperly filed.

Carlisle is…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Goode v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1978
  2. Sheppard v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  3. Salser v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  4. Salser v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  5. Davis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Logan v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2003
  2. Sheppard v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2009
  3. Padilla-Padial v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
  4. Carlisle v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
  5. Stewart v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API