Legal Opinion

Gilmour v. Longmire

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 1941No. 28060PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDriver, J.

Plaintiff filed his complaint, on November 16, 1939. The defendant was erroneously designated therein as “L. L. Longmire,” instead of “E. E. Long-mire,” and, in order to correct the mistake, the plaintiff filed an amended complaint on the following day. With the exception of the defendant’s initials and the date of verification, the two pleadings were identical.

In his amended complaint, the plaintiff alleged: That he had been doing business under a trade name and had filed a certificate thereof, as required by law;

“That on or about the 3rd day of January, 1935, at Ellensburg in the said…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Findley v. FindleyWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Federal Rubber Co. v. M. M. Stewart Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Martin v. BatemanWashington Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Heitmiller v. PrallWashington Supreme Court · 1919

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Peterson v. HaganWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Scheele v. City of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Wilber v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Beckman Bros. v. WeirMontana Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Olson v. Roberts & Schaeffer Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1980

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API