Legal Opinion

City of Tulsa v. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co.

District Court, N.D. Oklahoma

Decided January 29, 1934No. 1293PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRANKLIN E. KENNAMER, District Judge.

Plaintiff’s petition contains three causes of action. The first is to recover 4 per cent, of the gross revenue derived by defendant from its business at Tulsa from January 5, 1923, to June 1, 1932, under certain provisions of the city charter hereafter mentioned; the second is to eject defendant from the streets and alleys of the city; and the third is to recover damages for defendant’s alleged unlawful use of the streets and alleys of plaintiff from January 5, 1923, to June 1, 1932.

At the close of all the evidence, defendant has moved for a directed…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. The Employers'liability CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Kansas Ex Rel. ColemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  3. Cherokee Nation v. Southern Kansas Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1890
  4. Stephenson v. BinfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. Telegraph Co. v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1882

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Red Rock Petroleum Co. v. City of ChoctawCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1984
  2. WRT Realty, Inc. v. Boston Investment Group II, L.L.C.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2012
  3. Opinion No. (1999), Oklahoma Attorney General Reports1999
  4. Opinion No. (2006), Oklahoma Attorney General Reports2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API