Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

City of Norton v. Hurt

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 18, 2003No. 89,016PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Gernon, J.:

Jason Hurt appeals his sentence for driving under the influence (DUI), claiming the enhanced sentencing provisions of Kansas law relating to DUI violate the constitutional prohibition against ex post facto laws.

Hurt was arrested for DUI in August 2001 inside the city limits of Norton. Hurt was charged with a second offense DUI because he had a previous DUI diversion in 1995.

Hurt pled guilty in municipal court to the 2001 DUI but moved to be sentenced as a first offender, which was denied.

Hurt appealed to the district court, arguing that it…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Collins v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Nichols v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. State v. RolenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1995
  4. State v. StoenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999
  5. Anderson v. BruceSupreme Court of Kansas · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. GarySupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
  2. State v. SedillosSupreme Court of Kansas · 2005
  3. State v. ChamberlainSupreme Court of Kansas · 2005
  4. Chambers v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2014
  5. State v. SedillosCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API