State v. Sedillos
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Green, J.:
Phillip Sedillos appeals from a bench trial conviction of driving under the influence (DUI) of alcohol in violation of K.S.A. 2002 Supp. 8-1567. First, Sedillos argues that because he *142had previously been informed that his prior DUI convictions would decay after 5 years, the classification of his current DUI conviction as a third offense and felony violates the Ex Post Facto and Due Process Clauses of the United States Constitution. We find that Sedillos’ constitutional arguments fail. Finally, Sedillos argues that the trial court erred in using his two prior DUI convictions to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Stogner v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Falter v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
- State v. MaassSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
- Williamson v. City of HaysSupreme Court of Kansas · 2003
- GT, Kansas, L.L.C. v. Riley County Register of DeedsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. SedillosSupreme Court of Kansas · 2005