In the Matter of Phyllis Peterson, Now Known as Phyllis Martin, Court Reporter. United States of America v. Robert Marshall
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DUNIWAY, Circuit Judge:
This proceeding grows out of the appeals in United States v. Marshall, 9 Cir., 1973, 488 F.2d 1169. In our opinion in that case, we set out, line for line, with all indentations, portions of the 1,410 page reporter’s transcript, to show the format in which that transcript was prepared by the reporter. We also described the controversy about the transcript (see 488 F.2d at 1196-1204).
When our opinion was filed, we issued an order directing the reporter to show cause why she should not be required to repay the moneys that were paid to her as a result of the trial…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- United States v. Robert Marshall, United States of America v. Dennis Eischen, United States of America v. Ronald Lee MorganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. City of PittsburghCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- HOLLOWAY v. McMORDIECourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- In The Matter Of Lanceford C. BjellaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
- Seco Nevada, Inc. v. McMordieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. City Of PittsburghCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.