Legal Opinion

People v. Gallant

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 15, 1990No. E007636PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HOLLENHORST, Acting P. J.

Defendant pleaded guilty to one count of possession of methamphetamine for sale (Health & Saf. Code, § 11378), after his motion to suppress evidence (Pen. Code, § 1538.5) was denied. Defendant appeals from the resulting conviction, on the ground that the trial court had erred in denying his motion. (Id., subd. (m).) Concluding that the detention and search of defendant had been unreasonable, we reverse. )

The Facts

Early on a September evening, five police officers were executing a search warrant at a single-family residence in Riverside. The warrant authorized…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Michigan v. SummersSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Michigan v. ChesternutSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. GlaserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. People v. LimonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  3. People v. HepnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  4. People v. GallegosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  5. People v. RodriguezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API