Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Connor

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 5, 1984Published

1Dissent

Chief Judge Cooke

(dissenting). No view of the record in

this case or of the law governing waiver of the right to be tried by information supports the majority’s conclusion that defendant waived this explicit statutory right, imbued with jurisdictional implications. Therefore, respectfully, I must dissent.

“The Criminal Court clearly has no jurisdiction to take to trial a defendant who is charged only by a complaint and who has not waived the filing of a sufficient information” (People v Colon, 110 Misc 2d 917, 920, revd 112 Misc 2d 790, revd on opn at Criminal Ct 59 NY2d 921). Moreover, it is…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. People v. HobsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. People v. NixonNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
  4. People v. SawyerNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  5. People v. EppsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API