Legal Opinion

Scheiber v. United Telephone Co.

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1899No. 19,141PublishedCited by 12 opinions

From the Huntington Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBaker, J.

Appellant filed a complaint in one paragraph to recover for personal injuries alleged to have been received through the agency of lightning conducted into appellant’s storeroom over appellee’s wires. > Demurrer sustained. Exception by appellant. Afterwards, by leave of court, appellant filed a “second paragraph of complaint”. Demurrer sustained. Exception by appellant. Afterwards, by leave of court, appellant filed a “third paragraph of complaint”. Demurrer sustained. Exception by appellant. Upon appellant’s refusal to plead further, the judgment was rendered from which this appeal was taken.

T…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. BatesIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. StupakIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Hormann v. HartmetzIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  4. City of Evansville v. SummersIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. BerryIndiana Supreme Court · 1899

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Berry and Berry v. BartonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1902
  2. Kamp v. Coxe Bros. & Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Humphrey v. City National BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Aetna Insurance v. Indiana National Life InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Tipton Light, Heat & Power Co. v. NewcomerIndiana Supreme Court · 1900

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API