Legal Opinion

Startup v. Harmon

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1921No. 3715PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Original proceeding in mandamus by George A. Startup against Jesse Harmon and others, as County Commissioners of Utah County.

1Opinion of the CourtThurman, J.

This is an original proceeding in mandamus, praying that a peremptory writ of mandate issue, commanding the defendants, as county commissioners of Utah County, to provide annual funds, not exceeding $10,000 in any one year, to be expended for the partial support of widowed mothers who are dependent upon their own efforts for the maintenance of their children. Plaintiff prays for such other judgment or order as may be legal and proper.

The application for the writ is founded upon the provisions of Comp. Laws Utah 1917, § 3960, as amended in chapter 77, Sess. Laws Utah 1919, which section reads…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Bobbett v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872
  2. County Commissioners v. People ex rel. MetzIllinois Supreme Court · 1849
  3. Mason v. FearsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
  4. People ex rel. Faulkner v. HarrisIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Sterling v. Regents of UniversityMichigan Supreme Court · 1896

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Society of Professional Journalists v. BullockUtah Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Terracor v. Utah Board of State Lands & ForestryUtah Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Gregory v. ShurtleffUtah Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Nelson v. EcklundNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1938
  5. McCarthy v. Public Service Commission of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1938

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API