Legal Opinion

Cook v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 17, 1936No. 10225PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PLEASANTS, Chief Justice.

It is impossible to make a succinct statement of the nature and result of this suit because of the fact that the pleadings upon which the judgment appealed from was rendered cannot be clearly understood without a résumé of former pleadings and judgments made and rendered by and between the parties hereto with regard to the subject-matter of the suit. The following sufficient statement of these former proceedings a'nd judgments is copied from appellants’ brief:

“On December 11, 1931, the appellee, Fred T. Smith, held as collateral security a vendor’s lien note owned by…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. International & Great Northern Railroad v. BartonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1900
  2. City of Dallas v. McElroyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  3. Wilkerson v. Ft. Worth & D. C. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1915
  4. City of Seymour v. MontgomeryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Thermo Products Co. v. Chilton Independent School District, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1983
  2. Zarsky v. MossCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1946
  3. Gutierrez v. MaderoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  4. Medina Lake Protection Ass'n v. Bexar-Medina-Atascosa Counties Water Control & Improvement District No. 1Court of Appeals of Texas · 1983
  5. Stedman v. International Harvester Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1958

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API