Legal Opinion
Rate Setting Commission v. Faulkner Hospital
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided January 23, 1992PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLynch, J.
The plaintiff, Rate Setting Commission (commission), challenges the jurisdiction and the decisions of the Division of Administrative Law Appeals (division) adjusting the Administratively Necessary Day (AND)3 rates of the defendant hospitals (hospitals) for fiscal year 1982. The commission filed complaints in the Superior Court for judicial review pursuant to G. L. c. 30A, § 14 (1990 ed.), and G. L. c. 6A, § 36 (1990 ed.), of each decision. By an agreement of the parties, proceedings in all cases were stayed pending the final disposition of related declaratory judgment actions. Those actions…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hashimi v. KalilMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
- Bronstein v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
- Haran v. Board of Registration in MedicineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
- Quincy City Hospital v. RATE SETTING COMMISSIONMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
- New England Memorial Hospital v. Rate Setting CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Commonwealth v. LydonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
- Woodbridge Place Apartments v. Washington Square Capital, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Greater Media, Inc. v. Department of Public UtilitiesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
- Volin v. Board of Public AccountancyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
- Salisbury Nursing & Rehabilitation Center, Inc. v. Division of Administrative Law AppealsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2007
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.