Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Garrett v. Froehlich

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1903PublishedCited by 23 opinions

MaNdamus to the Secretary of State. October 22, 1902, the relator filed in this court a petition for an alternative writ of mandamus to compel the defendant, as secretary of state, to draw a warrant on the state treasurer, payable to him, for $492.36, in the manner provided by ch. 468, Laws of 1901, or show cause to the contrary.

Read the full summary

MaNdamus to the Secretary of State. October 22, 1902, the relator filed in this court a petition for an alternative writ of mandamus to compel the defendant, as secretary of state, to draw a warrant on the state treasurer, payable to him, for $492.36, in the manner provided by ch. 468, Laws of 1901, or show cause to the contrary. The petition alleges, in effect, that the relator was a resident and citizen of Eau Claire; that after the enactment of ch. 203, Laws of 1895, providing for the Keeley treatment and cure of inebriates, and during 1895, 1896, and 1897, one Dr. Montgomery established…

1Opinion of the Court

The following opinion was filed March 21, 1903:

Cassoday, C. J.

Ch. 203, Laws of 1895, providing “for the treatment and cure of inebriates and persons addicted to the excessive use of drugs and other narcotics,” was held to be unconstitutional and void, because it involved the imposition upon the respective counties of the state, without their consent, of a tax for the benefit of private institutions and individuals, not the legitimate objects of public charity. Wis. K. I. Co. v. Milwaukee Co. 95 Wis. 153, 158-160, 70 N. W. 68, 70. In that case it was said by the court :

• “The act in question…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Field v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. United States v. Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. Town of Guilford v. . the Supervisors of Chenango CountyNew York Court of Appeals · 1855
  4. Wisconsin Industrial School for Girls v. Clark CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Brodhead v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1865

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Bolens v. FrearWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Hunter v. Colfax Consolidated Coal Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1915
  3. State ex rel. Attorney General v. DonaldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
  5. State Ex Rel. Warren v. ReuterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API