Succession of Drysdale
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Proceedings for settlement of the Succession of Andrew Drysdale. Application by Mary Ann Pike for writs of certiorari, mandamus, and prohibition. Petition dismissed.
1Opinion of the CourtBreaux, C. J.
The heirs of the late Julia Pike Drysdale, relators, substantially aver that the judicial sequestration by the sheriff has been dissolved by the effect of a judgment of the Supreme Court rendered recently in that succession.
The heirs of Mrs. Drysdale (relators here) ask that the judicial sequestration, issued at the instance of Andrew Drysdale’s heirs, be annulled and vacated, and that they (these heirs) be placed in possession of the property.
• Hereafter, in referring to these heirs, for convenience, we will refer to the Julia Pike Drysdale heirs as the Julia Drysdale heirs, and to the heirs…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Schwan v. SchwanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1900
- Succession of DrysdaleSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1910
- Adriance v. McCaffertyThe Superior Court of New York City · 1864
- Liquidator of Clinton & Port Hudson Railroad v. EasonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1859
- Pitot v. ElmesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1809
3Cited by6 opinions
- Board of Com'rs of Orleans Levee Dist. v. ShushanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1941
- Succession of PavelkaSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
- Ludwig v. CallowaySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1939
- Thieme v. CollierLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1930
- Vizier v. VizierSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.