Legal Opinion

United States v. Hill

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided July 2, 1982No. ACM S25465PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

MILLER, Judge:

The accused was convicted, contrary to his pleas, of making and uttering worthless checks on six different occasions, in violation of Article 123a, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 923a. He was sentenced to a bad conduct discharge, confinement at hard labor for three months, and forfeiture of $275.00 per month for three months.

The defense asserts that acts of subsequent misconduct cannot be admitted in a litigated case under the provisions of Military Rule of Evidence (Mil.R.Evid.) 404(b) and that certain letters of reprimand should not have been admitted…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. Ernest FairchildCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1976
  2. United States v. Michael O. FarberCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
  3. United States v. Allen Thiel, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
  4. United States v. HagyU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1981
  5. United States v. Day Drew LuttrellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. WoodyardUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
  2. United States v. JamesUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2005
  3. United States v. HopwoodU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1989
  4. United States v. WilliamsU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API