Legal Opinion

Gaither v. . Clement

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 3, 1922PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiff alleged that he was injured by the negligence of the defendant. Defendant denied negligence, and pleaded plaintiff's contributory negligence and assumption of risk. The issues of negligence, contributory negligence, assumption of risk, and damages were answered in favor of the plaintiff. Judgment on the verdict, and appeal by the defendant.

The plaintiff's statement of facts is substantially as follows: "The plaintiff, at the time of his injury, was in the employ of the defendant as a carpenter, having had no experience in concrete work. The defendant was engaged in erecting a brick…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. BaughSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Choctaw, Oklahoma & Gulf R. R. v. McDadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  3. Washington & Georgetown Railroad v. McDadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  4. Gardner v. Michigan Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  5. Martin v. Highland Park Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1901

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dellinger v. . Building Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  2. Dellinger v. Elliott Building Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API