Legal Opinion
Tourigny v. Symantec Corp.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided April 24, 2015No. Case No. 15-cv-00438 NCPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO REMAND
NATHANAEL M. COUSINS, United States Magistrate Judge
Before the Court is Tourigny’s motion to remand this action to state court. Because the Court agrees that the plain language and policy behind the local defendant rule bars Symantec from removing the case, *962the Court GRANTS Tourigny’s motion to remand.
In November 2014, plaintiff Paul Tourig-ny sued Symantec Corporation in California Superior Court for age discrimination in violation of the California Fair Employment and Housing Act. In January 2015, after Tourigny notified Symantec of an error in the initial…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Shamrock Oil & Gas Corp. v. SheetsSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Provincial Gov't of Marinduque v. Placer Dome, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Emma C. Lively v. Wild Oats Markets, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Global Industrial Investment Limited v. ChungDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2020
- Hayes v. VCOM SOLUTIONS, INC.District Court, N.D. California · 2025
- Kim v. LeeDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2021
- Latex Construction Company v. Nexus Gas TransmissionDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2020