Legal Opinion
Medeiros v. Merced County Sheriff Deputy Clark
District Court, E.D. California
Decided May 5, 2010No. CV-F-09-1177 OWW/GSAPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (Doc. 36)
OLIVER W. WANGER, District Judge.
Plaintiff Theodore Furtado Medeiros has filed a First Amended Complaint (“FAC”) for Damages against Defendants Merced County Sheriff Deputy Clark (# 5142) and Merced County Sheriff Deputy Eric Macias (# 5185), individually and in their official capacities, and Does 1-20. The FAC alleges:
2. On or about May 19, 2008 at approximately 7:30 p.m. plaintiff was asked by a Mend to obtain a telephone number of a Frank Rose who lived nearby.…
2Cases cited60 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Fetters v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Waldron v. RoarkNebraska Supreme Court · 2017
- Magana v. County of San DiegoDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2011
- Nakakura v. City and County of HonoluluDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2020
- Sergio Gonzalez, Jr. v. City of Modesto, et al.District Court, E.D. California · 2025
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.