Legal Opinion
Bond v. Ungerecht
Tennessee Supreme Court
Decided April 15, 1914PublishedCited by 4 opinions
FROM HAYWOOD. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Haywood County to the Court of Civil Appeals and by certiorari from the Court of Civil Appeals to the Supreme Court.— C. P. McKinney, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Williams
The hill of complaint was filed to recover of defendants a number of saw logs which it is alleged were wrongfully cut on the lands of complainant, Bond.
It is alleged that complainant had conveyed standing timber to the Hatehie Manufacturing Company by deed, dated November 3, 1905, which contained, among others, the following provisions pertinent to this inquiry :
“I Sallie Bond, for the consideration of $5,500, cash, have sold and do hereby transfer and convey unto said Hatehie Manufacturing Company, all of the timber of every kind and description [on tract of land, described].
“To have and to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- C. W. Zimmerman Mnfg. Co. v. DaffinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906
- Anderson v. Miami Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1911
- Carson v. Lumber Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1902
- Peirce v. FinertySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1911
- United States Coal & Oil Co. v. HarrisonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1912
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hanna v. BufordMissouri Court of Appeals · 1915
- Rodgers v. Anderson-Tully Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1929
- Chapman v. DearmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
- Lowe v. ClemmonsTennessee Supreme Court · 1953