Legal Opinion

Carson v. Lumber Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided May 24, 1902PublishedCited by 16 opinions

FROM LAKE. Appeal from Chancery Court of JNO. S. Cooper, Ch. Lake County,

1Opinion of the CourtBeard, J.

The complainants are the owners of a tract of timbered and overflowed land lying in Lake County, in this State. In February, 1893, they sold and conveyed to Hull & Polhemus, their heirs and assigns, all of the cottonwood trees on one thousand acres of this tract. In July, 1894, the fame grantors sold and conveyed to the same grantees all the timber growing • on the remainder of the tract; and in the same conveyance authorized Hull & Polhemus to cut the timber on the one thousand acres. In other words, by the two conveyances the grantees were vested with the right and title to all trees of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Golden v. GlockWisconsin Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Haskin v. RecordSupreme Court of Vermont · 1860

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Liston v. Chapman & Dewey Land Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
  2. Ecosystem Resources, L.C. v. Broadbent Land & Resources, L.L.C.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Fletcher v. LyonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
  4. Hendrickson v. LyonsWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  5. R. M. Cobban Realty Co. v. DonlanMontana Supreme Court · 1915

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API