Legal Opinion

Green v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided May 20, 1908No. 3837PublishedCited by 3 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

This conviction was for violating the local option law.

The information is attacked. Without discussing it, we hold that under the authorities the information is sufficient. However, the alleged purchaser was permitted to testify that about two months after he had purchased the quart of whisky from appellant, as set out in the information, he went before a court of inquiry held at the courthouse in Brown County, and there testified before said court of inquiry in regard to having purchased this quart of whisky from appellant, and that he there told the facts before…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gibson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1908
  2. Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1903
  3. McKnight v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1906
  4. Snowden v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1908

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Newton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1944
  2. Kirksey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
  3. White v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API