Carr v. Goldstein

The hill in this case avers that J. A. Carr became indebted to the Archibald-Goldstein Motors Company by virtue of his indorsement of a note for $7,400, with interest clue and payable January 1, 1921. Tlie bill avers that such note became the property of the complainant and was afterwards reduced to judgment in an action against J. A. Carr, which was unpaid, and it seeks to subject to the payment of said indebtedness two parcels of real estate conveyed to S. S. Carr, the wife of J. A. Carr, upon the ground that such conveyances were fraudulent as to complainant. The conveyances to S. S. Carr…