Legal Opinion

Dove v. Stanolind Oil & Gas Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided June 29, 1934No. 4850PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLS, Judge.

Plaintiff, for herself and on behalf of her minor children, is suing the Stanolind Oil & Gas Company of Tulsa, Old., successor to the Dixie Oil Company, for 300 weeks’ compensation, as dependents of the husband and father, Archie C. Dove.

The petition recites that on January 2, 1930, deceased suffered an accidental injury while working on an oil well for the Dixie Oil Company which eventually, on June 23, 1933, caused his death; that he was voluntarily paid weekly compensation to the date of his death; that petitioners, his dependents, are entitled under the provisions of Act No.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Monvoisin v. PlantSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1920
  2. Hoy v. T. S. Grayson Lumber Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1930
  3. Connell v. United States Sheet & Window Glass Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1925

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hawkins v. Employers Casualty CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1965
  2. Ford v. Louisiana & A. Ry. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1940
  3. Lewis v. Texas Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1936
  4. Ago, Florida Attorney General Reports1978
  5. Fred Sanford Spicer, Jr. v. State of MississippiMississippi Supreme Court · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API