Legal Opinion

Ago

Florida Attorney General Reports

Decided March 2, 1978Published

1Opinion of the Court

Barry Richard Gables

QUESTIONS:

1. Does the language appearing on the ballot by which the voters adopted s. 14, Art. X, State Const., have any bearing on the construction of the constitutional provision?

2. If so, what is the meaning of the phrase `fully funded' in the ballot provision?

3. What is the meaning of the phrase `sound actuarial basis' in the constitutional provision?

SUMMARY:

Section 14, Art. X, State Const., prohibits all governmental unit retirement and pension systems supported by public funds from granting increases in benefits unless those increases are funded on a `sound actuarial…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. City of St. Petersburg v. Briley, Wild & Assoc., Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1970
  2. State Ex Rel. Landis v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1935
  3. Sylvester v. TindallSupreme Court of Florida · 1944
  4. State v. Florida State Improvement CommissionSupreme Court of Florida · 1952
  5. In Re Advisory Opinion to GovernorSupreme Court of Florida · 1973

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API