Legal Opinion

United Pacific Insurance v. Buchanan

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided December 12, 1988No. 21746-1-IPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtWebster, J.

United Pacific Insurance Company (UPI), appeals a summary judgment dismissal of William F. Buchanan (William) as a party defendant. UPI asserts that the trial court erred when it found that William, an adjudicated incompetent, lacked capacity without representation by his appointed guardians to enter a bonding contract with UPI. We reverse and remand.

Facts

William suffered from chronic alcoholism accompanied by progressive memory loss and dementia. King County Superior Court adjudicated William incompetent on May 1, 1980. The court established a guardianship in his behalf, appointing William's…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wilson v. SteinbachWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Ward v. Richards & Rossano, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1988
  3. Thorpe v. HanscomSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  4. Breaux v. Allied Bank of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1985
  5. Feild v. KoonceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United Pacific Insurance v. BuchananCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API