Legal Opinion

Young v. Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.

Ohio Court of Claims

Decided December 29, 2017No. 2015-00867Published

1Opinion of the Court

[Cite as Young v. Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.,

2017-Ohio-9418.] CHAD YOUNG Case No. 2015-00867 Plaintiff Judge Patrick M. McGrath v. DECISION OHIO DEPARTMENT OF REHABILITATION AND CORRECTION Defendant {¶1} Before the court are (1) written objections filed on October 30, 2017 by defendant Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction (ODRC) to Magistrate Gary Peterson’s decision of September 6, 2017, (2) plaintiff Chad Young’s response to ODRC’s objections filed on November 7, 2017, (3) ODRC’s “Motion For Leave To File A Reply And To Utilize Alternate Technology In Support of Its Objections”…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mussivand v. DavidOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Weirum v. RKO General, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Keister v. Park Centre LanesOhio Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Jenkins v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. & Corr.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. Desantis v. SollerOhio Court of Appeals · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API