Legal Opinion

Friscia v. Bank of Am., N.A.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 2, 2015No. COA14–1125PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ELMORE, Judge.

On 12 June 2013 in Mecklenburg County Superior Court, plaintiffs-appellants Christopher C. Friscia and Maria A. Friscia (the "Friscias") filed a complaint against Bank of America, N.A. ("BANA"), Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. ("MERS"), Hutchens, Senter, Kellam & Petit, P.A. ("HSKP"), and Substitute Trustee Services, Inc. ("STS") (collectively "defendants"). The Friscias' complaint alleged the following nine causes of action: (i) Fraud by Forgery; (ii) Fraud; (iii) Fraud Through Decoy Assignment; (iv) Fraudulent Misrepresentation; (v) Fraud by Use of MERS; (vi)…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Johnson v. De GrandySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Reid v. AyersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  3. In re Foreclosure of Deed of Trust of Michael Weinman Associates General PartnershipSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
  4. Meehan v. CableCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997
  5. State v. BrownCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Barnett v. Bank of America, N.A.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API