Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Hallamore Motor Transportation, Inc.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.
The plaintiff (Conrail), a common carrier, seeks to recover charges for carrying freight by rail on two occasions from Cedar Rapids, Iowa, to Worcester, from the defendant (Hallamore), a motor common carrier, which unloaded the cargo and carried it to Quonset Point, Rhode Island. A judge of the Municipal Court of the City of Boston considered the case on a statement of agreed facts and found for Conrail. The Appellate Division agreed with the trial judge and dismissed the report to it. Judgment should have been entered for Hallamore.
We summarize the facts. Hallamore, without its authorization…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. FinkSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Central Iron & Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. York & Whitney Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Consolidated Freightways Corporation of Delaware v. Admiral CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1971
- Costonis v. Medford Housing AuthorityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1961
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Kansallis Finance Ltd. v. FernCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- Marine Bank v. Taz's Trucking Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
- E.W. Wylie Corp. v. Menard, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Zamoyski v. Fifty-Six Hope Road Music Ltd., Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2010
- O'Malley v. MoghulMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.