Legal Opinion
Federal Power Commission v. Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided January 6, 1949No. 9847PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GOODRICH, Circuit Judge.
Dramatis Personae.
1. Federal Power Commission, called “Commission,” plaintiff in the court below and appellant here.
2. Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company, called “Panhandle,” defendant below and appellee here.
3. State Corporation Commission of the State of Kansas.
4. Various Interveners, shareholders of Panhandle.
5. A part with no speaking lines but referred to by all the parties: Hugoton Production Company, called “Hugoton.” It is a child of Panhandle, incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware. Whether the child is legitimate or not is one of the points in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Federal Power Commission v. Hope Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Oklahoma Press Publishing Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Colorado Interstate Gas Co. v. Federal Power CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Endicott Johnson Corp. v. PerkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ederal Power Commission v. Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Kansas-Nebraska Natural Gas Co. v. State Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1950
- Federal Power Commission v. Arizona Edison Co., IncCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
- Kansas-Nebraska Natural Gas Co. v. State Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1951
- Ederal Power Commission v. Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.