Legal Opinion

Ederal Power Commission v. Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided October 10, 1949No. 558Published

1Opinion of the Court 1

337 U.S. 498 (1949)

FEDERAL POWER COMMISSION

v.

PANHANDLE EASTERN PIPE LINE CO. ET AL.

No. 558.

Supreme Court of United States.

Argued April 22, 1949.

Decided June 20, 1949.

CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT.

Bradford Ross argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Morison, Philip Elman, Paul A. Sweeney, Melvin Richter, Morton Hollander, Bernard A. Foster, Jr. and Howell Purdue.

Robert P. Patterson and Jeff A. Robertson argued the cause for respondents. With Mr. Patterson on the brief for the…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Reed; Dissent.

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Federal Power Commission v. Hope Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Hecht Co. v. BowlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Virginian Railway Co. v. System Federation No. 40Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  5. Porter v. Warner Holding Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API