Legal Opinion

Munters Corp. v. Swissco-Young Industries, Inc.

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided January 17, 2003No. 01-00-00752-CVPublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON REHEARING

ADELE HEDGES, Justice.

We deny Munters Corporation’s motion for rehearing. We withdraw our previous opinion and judgment dated April 11, 2002, and issue this opinion in its stead.

This appeal arises from a suit based on deceptive trade practices. Appellant appeals the trial court’s judgment in favor of appellee. We affirm.

Background

In early 1990, appellee Swissco-Young Industries, Inc. (Swissco) contracted with Harbor Cogeneration (Harbor) to design and install a system that would increase the electric output from Harbor’s cogener-ation turbine. Part of this design…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Cain v. BainTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Doe v. Boys Clubs of Greater Dallas, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Bradford v. VentoTexas Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Szczepanik v. First Southern Trust Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Lofton v. Texas Brine Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1986

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Nelson v. Najm, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2003
  2. Harlow v. Giles, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2004
  3. Bossier Chrysler Dodge II, Inc. v. Rauschenberg, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2006
  4. Shear Cuts, Inc. v. LittlejohnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2004
  5. Park Cities Ltd. Partnership v. Transpo Funding Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2004

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API